Annette Chambers-Smith, the head of the state prison
agency, said the state was buying 5,100 body cameras that will be used by
guards and parole officers in all of the state’s prisons. Not every guard will
wear a camera at all times, but the program is still ambitious: Axon, the
company that is supplying the cameras, said the state was adopting the largest
body camera program of any prison agency in the world.
There are already thousands of surveillance cameras
across Ohio’s 28 state prisons, but the addition of body cameras could make it
easier to review the actions of guards and prisoners, capturing incidents that
are not visible through existing cameras or are blocked from view by other
The move comes as several other states have begun to
use body cameras in prisons and jails, albeit on a smaller scale, amid
increasing criticism that prison guards, like police officers, are regularly
involved in violent encounters that may involve witnesses with competing
versions of events.
“This is ultimately about safety, transparency and
accountability for everyone who works or lives in our prisons,” Chambers-Smith
said in a statement.
The plan to roll out body cameras follows the death in
January 2021 of Michael McDaniel, 55, who collapsed and died after guards
pushed him to the ground several times after a fight outside his cell. A
coroner ruled that his death was a homicide, and the prison system fired seven
guards and a nurse; two more employees resigned. No criminal charges were
Surveillance video captured much of the guards’
encounter with McDaniel, who ended up on the ground 16 times over the course of
less than an hour. But the video missed several key moments: a stairwell
blocked much of the initial fight between McDaniel and the guards, in which
investigators determined that he had punched two officers, and the cameras
captured only part of a takedown, several minutes later, in which guards
appeared to push him into the snow outside.
McDaniel’s sister, Jada, said she supported the use of
body cameras and believed that the guards may have intentionally engaged her
brother behind the stairwell, knowing that it partially obscured what was
happening. She said she believed the guards would not have been so aggressive
with her brother had they all been wearing cameras.
“My brother would still be alive,” said Jada McDaniel,
who teaches math and science to fourth-graders in Columbus. “They would have
thought twice. They probably wouldn’t have taken him out and abused him the way
they did. There’s no way they would have taken him behind the stairwell.”
She said she believed the guards would also benefit
from having more of their interactions on camera.
“The guards need protection as well,” she said. “The
body camera will catch everything.”
A new prison agency policy governing body cameras says
that cameras may automatically activate when a gun or pepper spray is drawn.
The policy says that the cameras must be powered on at all times, meaning that
even if guards cannot or do not activate them, video would still be captured
and stored for 18 hours.
In jails and state and federal prisons across the
country, officials have been struggling to hire enough prison guards to fill in
for those who have retired, who fall ill with COVID-19 or who are avoiding
dangerous assignments, leaving correctional facilities with high infection
rates and not enough staff to handle potentially violent confrontations.
In New York City, stabbings at the massive jail
complex on Rikers Island have surged and gangs have increased their influence
in the jail during the pandemic as some prison guards have taken advantage of
generous sick leave policies to sidestep working at the jail. Some guards wear
body cameras at the complex, but not all.
In 2019, the sheriff overseeing the jail in Albany
County, New York, said he was putting body cameras on guards after several
inmates who had been transferred from Rikers Island said they had been abused
at the Albany jail. The sheriff said at the time that he believed the cameras
would have proved that the officers were innocent.
Prison officials in several other states, including
Wisconsin and Georgia, have begun to put cameras on some prison guards. A
lawsuit in California over claims that prison employees had violated disabled
prisoners’ rights led a judge to order that officers at five state prisons be outfitted
with the cameras. New York state has also tested the technology at some
prisons, and New Jersey lawmakers are considering a bill that would put body
cameras on every prison guard.
The Ohio Civil Service Employees Association, which
represents prison guards in the state, has not opposed the body camera program
but said it was a low priority at a time when there were 1,700 vacant positions
for correctional officers, in part because the state had not filled positions
of officers who had recently retired.
“To be frank, it’s hell right now,” union president
Christopher Mabe, a retired prison sergeant, said of working in Ohio prisons.
“Body cameras are a distraction, as far as we’re concerned, to the real and
dangerous staffing issues in prisons now.”
Chambers-Smith, the prisons director, said the body
cameras would cost $6.9 million in the first year and about $3.3 million each
year after that. They were being paid for by grants, funding from the federal
stimulus act passed by Congress in response to the pandemic in 2020, and the
department’s general budget.
© 2022 The New York Times Company